DAISY Consortium Logo - Link to Home Page

Minutes – Z39.86 Advisory Committee Conference Call

Date: 2007 May 23
Time: 9:00 – 10:00 EST
Venue: telcon
Conference Recording Filename: 20070523 (call the DAISY Conference number and enter *3 for playback)
Scribe: Kathy Kahl
Last Edited: 2007 May 23
Status: Version 1 reviewed by GK

Attendees

Advisory Committee:

Participating Experts:

Apologies:

Agenda

The agenda was distributed to the Advisory Committee list on 2007 May 21 with two attachments to the agenda in advance of the call.

Confirmation of Date and Time for Next Call

The next conference call is 2007 June 13, 0900 Eastern USA and then June 27, no calls in July.

Identifying the Sub-divisions of Work

George proposed that a single lead person be identified to manage or at least report on each of the various areas below in order to plan and finish what is needed by the October 1 & 2 F2F and the DAISY Technical Conference/TechShare October 4 & 5.

NISO
(Lead person: George)

ACTION: George - prepare high level project plan for May 23rd meeting, outlining milestones through October.
ACTION: George - Administrative tasks to be done by end of June:
  1. Terms of Reference for the working group
  2. A memorandum of understanding between NISO and DAISY regarding the maintenance agency agreement
  3. Harmony on IP policy and working group procedures between NISO and DAISY
  4. Common understanding regarding revision of the spec and modularization

The niso-communications list has been created which includes Pete, George, Kathy and Lynn.

Communications
(Lead person: Lynn)

ACTION: Lynn - prepare high level project plan for June 27th meeting, outlining milestones through October.

The niso-communications group will develop a work plan to cover issues such as overarching plans, budget items, communication and messaging with NISO.

Maintenance & Issues Tracking
(Lead person: Kathy)

Laurie will outline what is to be done with respect to DTD issues.

Architecture of Modular Specification Development
(Lead person: Marisa)

ACTION: Marisa - prepare high level project plan for May 23rd meeting, outlining milestones through October, incorporating architectural goals set at the Copenhagen meeting.

The zed-architecture list has been created which includes Dominic, George, James, Marisa, Markus, Ole, Romain, Julien, plus Lynn. Neil and Lloyd are interested in participating in the audio portion. Marisa will chair starting mid-May and confer with Markus.

How to Proceed with Requirements Gathering
(Lead person: Rob)

ACTION: Rob - prepare high level project plan for May 23rd meeting, outlining milestones through October.
ACTION: George and Markus to send draft of updated Roadmap document to Zed WG by June 13th meeting, for final approval by June 27th meeting.
ACTION: Rob - develop survey questions in coordination with Roadmap document.


George suggested that we need a unified message and can use web-based survey tools to gather input, pertaining to the agenda question: "What are the requirements for the next generation of DAISY/NISO for the LD, cognitive impaired, dyslexic, etc.?" Kathy suggested that the Road Map to Implementation of DAISY document, linked to from http://www.daisy.org/z3986/, be updated and used as the official unified message in conjunction with a survey. Survey results would lead to the next revision of the Roadmap, possibly at the next FTF. The detailed plan for profiling should be part of the focus of the updated Roadmap announcement and used as a basis for building survey questions.

ACTION ITEMS carried over from February FTF:

Outreach to organizations regarding participation on different profiles
(Lead person: George)

ACTION: George to outline a plan for contacting these organizations.

Again the Roadmap document can be the vehicle to deliver the unified message to help achieve this outreach. The goal here is to contact organizations personally to solicit participation with commercial efforts in the actual development, from the perspective of either submitting requirements or joining in on the actual work. These companies would have questions and expertise from the technology and implementation perspective.

ACTION ITEMS carried over from February FTF (regrouped by profile):

How do we approach these organisations in a way so that they can give us the information we need?